Application Integration

Should REST API security risks keep you awake at night?

potential of HIP

With the growth of REST APIs inside enterprises, but also outside their boundaries in their ecosystem, monitoring, protecting, and preventing attacks is key, and REST API security is of paramount importance. Not only failures in security implementations get API project stakeholders on alert, but also regulations like PSD2 have been kick-starting initiatives to standardize security implementations.

Questions around countermeasures and best practices in API security are now even getting attention from top-level management, because of the dramatic impact a security breach might potentially have on the company’s profitability and reputation.

A recent study by Ovum revealed that 87% of the interviewed audience were running an API Security Gateway, often part of a larger API Management platform such as Axway, IBM, CA, Google Apigee, to only mention the market leaders. So technology seems in place to protect those services against attacks.

If we look into some poor examples, we can take away a few tips and basic things that can be taken into account when implementing APIs.

REST API security risk #1: HTTPS protected API without any authentication

Providing an API using HTTPS is familiar to most developers already. But using an API not having any authentication for personalized services can be tricky as the Nissan Leaf Example tells us. Their API used a Vehicle Number as an identifier to allow actions like turning on the AC or reading the car’s logbook.

Unfortunately, those vehicle numbers were visible on the front window of all those cars (so if your neighbor had one, it was easy to get it) and were in the same number range. This issue resulted in Nissan shutting down this interesting service due to their inability to patch the service quickly.

REST API security risk #2: no rate limiting or throttling implemented

By failure of an Android App, the National Weather Service had to shut down the service for some time. The API was not throttled nor limited so the traffic peak directly hit the backend.
A good practice is to enforce a system-wide quota so that the backend cannot be overloaded. An even better practice is to set up an app- and/or user-based quota. This can be easily rolled out with the help of a modern API Developer Portal.

It’s also important to monitor overload situations closely and having implemented API keys or OAuth help identify the root cause more easily.

REST API security risk #3: unprotected identity and keys

An attack on Buffer occurred in 2013 where tokens and keys were stolen, resulting in hackers being able to send spam into social media networks using accounts using Buffer. OAuth/ OpenID Connect is used a lot to grant access to services on behalf of the user. These tokens give access for a longer period of time without handing over the password of the user to the app. This is a good thing, but users are usually not aware of this and struggle to understand the difference between password change and revoking access.

The full disclosure Buffer actually did help to understand the topic in more detail. In a few words, if you store any kind of identity or identity token somewhere, make sure that the system and APIs are protected and monitored very carefully. This starts not only with the API itself, but also where the data is stored, backed up, etc.

REST API security risk #4: unencrypted payload

There are still some apps – even if seldom — using unencrypted connections or payloads. Listening to traffic and API calls of websites and mobile apps is actually easier than you think. In a browser, it’s just an F12 hit away showing the browser developer’s view. Tools like Charles Proxy or Fiddler make it even easier to listen into the connection between the mobile App and the API. Correct use of HTTPS (see below) and if needed payload encryption can help mitigate the risk of exposure.

REST API security risk #5: incorrect use of HTTPS

As explained in the previous paragraph, using HTTPS does not prevent the connection from being intercepted. To prevent this from happening, Certificate Key Pinning needs to be implemented. Especially on mobile apps, there is native mobile OS Support for protecting certificates and use of Mutual SSL. All sensitive data like end-user credentials, API Keys, etc. should be sent over this Mutual SSL connection only.

REST API security risk #6: weak API keys

API keys are a good way to identify the consuming app of an API. Unfortunately, sometimes the key is sent as part of the URL which makes it appear in proxy logs or other places and easy to copy. Even if HTTPS is used correctly (see above), it can be sniffed. A good way to go around this is the use of AWS Style API Keys. Putting API Keys in the message header (which is usually not logged on public hotspots) is a good practice and Amazon even go further by using two keys:

  1. Secret Key ID to perform HMAC signing (with detection of replay attacks)
  2. Access Key ID to identify the client

Sounds complicated? No, it isn’t. 

REST API security risk #7: logic and security in the wrong place

Last but not least, security and implementation need to be in the right place. Looking at this example from Dominos App which allowed to fake a payment shows that it’s a good practice to put critical logic like payments or approvals in a secure place which is usually not the client app.

Scared? I hope not because there are tools and procedures available to solve these issues. API Gateways and API Management systems provide protection against:

  • Unauthorized Access
  • Parameter manipulation and Data harvesting
  • Network eavesdropping
  • Disclosure of sensitive customer data
  • Message Replay
  • Virus insertion

But also helps you drive your digital strategy efficiently.

Read about the security checklist you need for managing APIs.