Interoperability: It’s not just a box to check but an opportunity to transform

interoperability

So many get stuck in the compliance box mindset that they never realize the transformation opportunity that interoperability presents until it’s too late.

Here’s an example from 2013, when, here in the United States, the ONC required the ability for each patient to have access to a patient portal that enables self-service to medical records and the ability to directly message their healthcare providers, as well as be able to support self-directed care and decision-making for providers to achieve Meaningful Use Stage 2 incentive goals.

The goal was to free providers to focus on high-priority patients and empower patients to have access to their health data and resources at any time they needed without requiring them to go to their provider’s office.

This unfortunately was not treated as an opportunity, but as a compliance box to check off as done. The portals were built, but nobody came. The result was it was overly complex to access and light on purposeful engagement tools that went beyond compliance requirements.

Even more telling was in 2014, 33% of surveyed patients reported they weren’t even aware if they had a portal available to them, and of those that were aware less than 5% were active citing dissatisfaction as the main reason for not actively engaging with them.

In 2018, an ONC poll showed that 52% of patients had access to a portal with only 28% of those accessing their records through it. Of the 24% of respondents that had access to a portal but did not take advantage of viewing their records, 76% stated they wanted to speak to the provider in person as the reason not to use the portal.

This highlights the intended value of a patient portal is still not reaching the targeted audience, resulting in a checked compliance box but an ongoing missed opportunity.

The current interoperability requirement

Unfortunately, the current interoperability requirement of payers and providers to give patients/members access to pricing data (Price Transparency Rule is also being perceived as a regulatory chore and not as the patient engagement opportunity it should be).

Providers and payers alike can leverage this information to build comparison data that can be used to boost contract negotiations, create a center of excellence care sites, lower the overall costs of care, and improve patient outcomes.

Payer perspective

One would think this information has always been available and common knowledge, right? Why would you need compliance regulation for something that seems so obvious and beneficial to know?

You may be surprised to learn that pricing data has always been one of the most highly guarded secrets in healthcare. Until recently, ask any payer for their charge/payment and they would rather give up the lucrative salaries of their top-paid executives before ever giving up their pricing/payment information.

Why you ask? Contracts. Every payer has specific payment contracts with the providers, hospitals, and service facilities that provide care to their members.

And making those differences known can have a deep impact during contract negotiations. Not to mention how varying member policies can be and what those variations mean to the end consumer/member/patient and the drastic effect it can have on the amount they are responsible for out-of-pocket.

According to a review by Fierce Healthcare, MedStar Georgetown’s list of shoppable services offers an example of some major differences among its payers.

For instance, “the repair of superficial wounds to the neck, scalp or hands and feet has a negotiated charge of $505 for CareFirst but $4,138 for Cigna, according to the hospital’s spreadsheet.”

That can mean the difference of a patient paying thousands of dollars out-of-pocket compared to hundreds of dollars for the same procedure at the same facility. Shocking right?

Provider perspective

That explains the payer history, but what does it mean from the provider aspect now that they must also make public a list of their most common services and the charges associated with them?

Hasn’t this always been publicly available and transparent? The answer to that question may or may not surprise you again, but no, it hasn’t. The “why” is very similar to the reasoning that insurance payers gave in the past.

It’s complex and varies based on specific factors such as insurance contract or self-pay status, location and type of services rendered, and who provided them.

Payers and providers have argued against being required to show this information stating that it is confusing and not helpful to the average patient even though the above example clearly shows otherwise. Hence, they are stuck in the compliance box mindset.

Moving out of the compliance box mindset and into the transformation opportunity zone requires a shift in perspective. Anyone who has ever worked in healthcare can affirm shifting attitudes, especially when it comes to adopting a new digital strategy and openness, is not an easy pill to swallow.

It requires a lot of coaxing and assurances that what seems like a shackle today is a benefit that will lead to new growth and confidence with the patients and families they have been entrusted to care for tomorrow.

How do we get there?

It starts with keeping the end beneficiary in mind and focusing on their overall digital experience and improved health outcomes as the catalyst for driving new interoperability initiatives, not compliance.

Instead of focusing on the difficulty and complexity that providing access to pricing transparency may bring, instead focus on the value it will provide to the patient and their families and ultimately the provider and payer, as well with the right strategy taken.

The value realized to the payer/provider in the form of improved care outcomes resulting from a reduction in delayed treatment due to the potential cost of care. This is one of the most immediate benefits that could be actualized if implemented with a customer-centric benefit approach.

Care delayed today becomes costlier care tomorrow. Requiring advanced interventions possibly when low-to-moderate actions would only have been needed if treated sooner. The cost of delay is real and calculable not to mention the deficit to the patients quality of life when the cost is the driving factor in not seeking intervention earlier.

Pivoting the focus away from compliance and complexity to the needs of the patient/member and the value they receive from enhanced transparency and self-service digital access to information, interoperability compliance then becomes the resulting consequence of creating purposeful consumer-centric solutions.

The next requirement is to have the right partner like Axway. We guide you through the most complex Interoperability requirements, as well as provide the correct tools that ensure ongoing digital transformation success and not only regulatory compliance.

For example, a marketplace for accessible APIs that provides both scalable, open access and security and control.

While uploading a spreadsheet and calling it a day may meet the minimum for compliance, it does nothing to create a digital experience that is meaningful to a patient/member trying to understand the full scope of their potential healthcare costs and the resulting impacts of choosing a specific provider/facility of care over another or even the difference of them seeking care at all.

Lack of adoption

Going back to my earlier example of the lack of adoption of patient portals within the United States, the reason patient portals are failing is not because of lack of patient interest, but because no one has elicited the buy-in from providers highlighting the value of having their patients interact via a portal and the positive impact this can have on their care plan outcomes.

Creating this connection for providers is a critical step toward them becoming portal advocates that then encourage their patients to log in and shift from being an inactive observer to an active participant in their health and shared care outcome goals.

This combined with creating patient portals that are focused more on an engaging end-user experience vs compliance requirements will go a long way in finally realizing the intended goal and potential of portals in enhancing the quality of care able to be delivered and the patient’s ability to have self-service access and control of their healthcare data.

This example of a failed execution underscores the importance of making sure to find the right evangelist that also has a high stake in the success of implementing value-driven, patient/member-focused, digital transformation requirements.

Doing so not because they are ticking a box, but because they realize that it creates an opportunity for them to have a positive effect on the patients ongoing health beyond the 15 minutes of an in-person encounter.

The role of Electronic Health Records

To achieve these intended outcomes will require also bringing Electronic Health Records (EHR) into the conversation. Even though the new Interoperability rules focus on providers and payers, everything at some point lives and flows through an EHR system.

Many times, these systems also provide the portals required for providers to give to their patients and to facilitate the transmission of records between providers, payers, patients, and third-party applications as is required by the Interoperability rules going into effect in July of 2021.

Ensuring these systems are ready to facilitate compliance and demonstrate a commitment to preventing Information Blocking will be critical toward any strides made in achieving true interoperability.

Conclusion

If we can shift our focus to this mindset, compliance is the bonus that will come with it for free. Unfortunately, after almost 10 years into this journey of digital transformation and transparency, we are still missing the mark when it comes to the opportunity that interoperability offers beyond checking a compliance box to avoid the stick of financial penalties.

We can and must do better in this regard as we continue down this new path, learning from the past missed opportunities. As we head into the future of open healthcare that is not only transparent, accessible, secure, and compliant, but is above all else effectual, valuable, relevant, and ever-evolving.

Let Axway help you out of the compliance box and transform into the opportunity zone. Make sure you are working with a digital transformation partner that understands and supports your goals: making data exchanges secure, consumer and partner experiences brilliant, and making it easy to manage and monitor the traffic moving through your portals and gateways.

Discover more about Axway’s Healthcare solutions.

Previous articleGriffin Spotlight: Andrea Talarico walks the extra mile to develop the market and create new business opportunities
Next articleGet ready to level up at Axway Summit 2021
Principal Product Manager -- API Management, Lorri has a strong background in healthcare for the last 15 years from both a Provider and Payer perspective. She works closely with technology partners in this capacity to better the provider and patient experiences. Areas of focus include practice management systems, electronic health records, electronic prescribing systems, EDI applications, and integration management. She currently uses her practical and technological healthcare experience to help customers forge ahead in their digital transformation journey utilizing Axway’s API Management and healthcare solutions portfolio.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here